{"id":23,"date":"2023-08-01T16:20:24","date_gmt":"2023-08-01T20:20:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/pressbooks.library.torontomu.ca\/cebe\/chapter\/__unknown__\/"},"modified":"2023-08-22T12:12:40","modified_gmt":"2023-08-22T16:12:40","slug":"agency","status":"publish","type":"chapter","link":"https:\/\/pressbooks.library.torontomu.ca\/cebe\/chapter\/agency\/","title":{"raw":"Agency","rendered":"Agency"},"content":{"raw":"<strong>Agency<\/strong> is a contractual relationship between two parties, in which one party \u2013 the <em>agent<\/em> \u2013 is empowered to act, to make certain decisions, and to make legally-binding agreements on behalf of another party \u2013 the <em>principal<\/em> \u2013 subject to the principal\u2019s control. Agents are duty-bound at law to act as <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks.library.torontomu.ca\/cebe\/chapter\/fiduciary\/\">fiduciaries<\/a> for their principals. Agency relationships are ubiquitous features of business because they permit both individuals and companies to conduct business and enter into contractual relationships in many different places at the same time. One powerful way to think of a company or a firm is as a web of agency relationships.\r\n\r\nAgency is an important concept in business ethics for a number of reasons. First, agency relationships are frequent sources of <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks.library.torontomu.ca\/cebe\/chapter\/conflict-of-interest\/\">conflicts of interest<\/a>. For example, an agent offered a bribe by a third party to bind the agent\u2019s principal to that third party faces a conflict between her interest in securing payment from the third party and satisfying her duty to act in the best interests of her principal. (In the economics literature, this is referred to as the \u201cagency problem.\u201d) Second, there is sometimes a gap between an agent\u2019s <em>actual<\/em> authority (as granted by the principal) and the agent\u2019s <em>apparent<\/em> authority in the eyes of the third parties with whom she deals on the principal\u2019s behalf. Agents may accidentally or intentionally exceed their authority and bind principals to contractual relationships outside their actual authority. Third, because they are fiduciaries, agents are supposed to exercise their authority <em>partially<\/em>\u2014in favor of their principals. Acting ethically as an agent is less like being a neutral and impartial judge between the principal and third parties and more like being an advocate of the principal\u2019s interests.\r\n\r\n<strong>See also in CEBE:<\/strong>\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li><a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks.library.torontomu.ca\/cebe\/chapter\/conflict-of-interest\/\">Conflict of interest<\/a><\/li>\r\n \t<li><a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks.library.torontomu.ca\/cebe\/chapter\/fiduciary\/\">Fiduciary<\/a><\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<strong>Further Reading:<\/strong>\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li>Joseph Heath, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/27755309\">\u201cThe Uses and Abuses of Agency Theory.\u201d<\/a>\u00a0<em>Business Ethics Quarterly<\/em>, Volume 19, Issue 4, October 2009.<\/li>\r\n \t<li>John Winsor Pratt and Richard Zeckhauser, eds., <em><a href=\"https:\/\/href.li\/?http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/exec\/obidos\/ASIN\/0875841643\/ethics\">Principals and Agents: The Structure of Business<\/a><\/em> (Harvard Business School Press, 1985).<\/li>\r\n \t<li><a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Law_of_agency\">Law of agency<\/a> (Wikipedia entry).<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<div id=\"jp-post-flair\" class=\"sharedaddy sd-like-enabled sd-sharing-enabled\">\r\n<div class=\"sharedaddy sd-block sd-like jetpack-likes-widget-wrapper jetpack-likes-widget-unloaded\" id=\"like-post-wrapper-65140947-5-64c968f3a4009\" data-src=\"\/\/widgets.wp.com\/likes\/index.html?ver=20230309#blog_id=65140947&amp;post_id=5&amp;origin=encycbusethics.wordpress.com&amp;obj_id=65140947-5-64c968f3a4009&amp;domain=conciseencyclopedia.org\" data-name=\"like-post-frame-65140947-5-64c968f3a4009\" data-title=\"Like or Reblog\">\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<\/div>","rendered":"<p><strong>Agency<\/strong> is a contractual relationship between two parties, in which one party \u2013 the <em>agent<\/em> \u2013 is empowered to act, to make certain decisions, and to make legally-binding agreements on behalf of another party \u2013 the <em>principal<\/em> \u2013 subject to the principal\u2019s control. Agents are duty-bound at law to act as <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks.library.torontomu.ca\/cebe\/chapter\/fiduciary\/\">fiduciaries<\/a> for their principals. Agency relationships are ubiquitous features of business because they permit both individuals and companies to conduct business and enter into contractual relationships in many different places at the same time. One powerful way to think of a company or a firm is as a web of agency relationships.<\/p>\n<p>Agency is an important concept in business ethics for a number of reasons. First, agency relationships are frequent sources of <a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks.library.torontomu.ca\/cebe\/chapter\/conflict-of-interest\/\">conflicts of interest<\/a>. For example, an agent offered a bribe by a third party to bind the agent\u2019s principal to that third party faces a conflict between her interest in securing payment from the third party and satisfying her duty to act in the best interests of her principal. (In the economics literature, this is referred to as the \u201cagency problem.\u201d) Second, there is sometimes a gap between an agent\u2019s <em>actual<\/em> authority (as granted by the principal) and the agent\u2019s <em>apparent<\/em> authority in the eyes of the third parties with whom she deals on the principal\u2019s behalf. Agents may accidentally or intentionally exceed their authority and bind principals to contractual relationships outside their actual authority. Third, because they are fiduciaries, agents are supposed to exercise their authority <em>partially<\/em>\u2014in favor of their principals. Acting ethically as an agent is less like being a neutral and impartial judge between the principal and third parties and more like being an advocate of the principal\u2019s interests.<\/p>\n<p><strong>See also in CEBE:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks.library.torontomu.ca\/cebe\/chapter\/conflict-of-interest\/\">Conflict of interest<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/pressbooks.library.torontomu.ca\/cebe\/chapter\/fiduciary\/\">Fiduciary<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Further Reading:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Joseph Heath, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/27755309\">\u201cThe Uses and Abuses of Agency Theory.\u201d<\/a>\u00a0<em>Business Ethics Quarterly<\/em>, Volume 19, Issue 4, October 2009.<\/li>\n<li>John Winsor Pratt and Richard Zeckhauser, eds., <em><a href=\"https:\/\/href.li\/?http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/exec\/obidos\/ASIN\/0875841643\/ethics\">Principals and Agents: The Structure of Business<\/a><\/em> (Harvard Business School Press, 1985).<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Law_of_agency\">Law of agency<\/a> (Wikipedia entry).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<div id=\"jp-post-flair\" class=\"sharedaddy sd-like-enabled sd-sharing-enabled\">\n<div class=\"sharedaddy sd-block sd-like jetpack-likes-widget-wrapper jetpack-likes-widget-unloaded\" id=\"like-post-wrapper-65140947-5-64c968f3a4009\" data-src=\"\/\/widgets.wp.com\/likes\/index.html?ver=20230309#blog_id=65140947&amp;post_id=5&amp;origin=encycbusethics.wordpress.com&amp;obj_id=65140947-5-64c968f3a4009&amp;domain=conciseencyclopedia.org\" data-name=\"like-post-frame-65140947-5-64c968f3a4009\" data-title=\"Like or Reblog\">\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":504,"menu_order":1,"template":"","meta":{"pb_show_title":"on","pb_short_title":"","pb_subtitle":"","pb_authors":[],"pb_section_license":""},"chapter-type":[],"contributor":[],"license":[],"class_list":["post-23","chapter","type-chapter","status-publish","hentry"],"part":3,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.library.torontomu.ca\/cebe\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/23","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.library.torontomu.ca\/cebe\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.library.torontomu.ca\/cebe\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/chapter"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.library.torontomu.ca\/cebe\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/504"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.library.torontomu.ca\/cebe\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/23\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":192,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.library.torontomu.ca\/cebe\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/23\/revisions\/192"}],"part":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.library.torontomu.ca\/cebe\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/parts\/3"}],"metadata":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.library.torontomu.ca\/cebe\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/23\/metadata\/"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.library.torontomu.ca\/cebe\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=23"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"chapter-type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.library.torontomu.ca\/cebe\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapter-type?post=23"},{"taxonomy":"contributor","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.library.torontomu.ca\/cebe\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/contributor?post=23"},{"taxonomy":"license","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.library.torontomu.ca\/cebe\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/license?post=23"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}