{"id":54,"date":"2018-05-01T13:36:50","date_gmt":"2018-05-01T17:36:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/pressbooks.library.torontomu.ca\/cmn279\/chapter\/3-3-collecting-sources-by-reading-with-a-purpose\/"},"modified":"2023-12-19T20:48:51","modified_gmt":"2023-12-20T01:48:51","slug":"3-3-collecting-sources-by-reading-with-a-purpose","status":"publish","type":"chapter","link":"https:\/\/pressbooks.library.torontomu.ca\/cmn279\/chapter\/3-3-collecting-sources-by-reading-with-a-purpose\/","title":{"raw":"3.3: Collecting Sources by Reading with a Purpose","rendered":"3.3: Collecting Sources by Reading with a Purpose"},"content":{"raw":"
\r\n

Learning Objectives<\/h3>\r\n4. Use effective reading strategies to collect and reframe information from a variety of written materials accurately.\r\n\r\ni. Separate main ideas from subordinate ideas in written materials.\r\nii. Identify the organizational structure of a variety of written messages.\r\niii. Read with a purpose to identify needed information.\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\nPart of the process of identifying credible sources involves reading critically to find the best information available for your purposes, and those are whatever you\u2019ve determined your audience\u2019s needs to be. When collecting sources online by entering key terms into a search engine, examining the list of titles, and clicking on those that seem relevant, you begin the process of narrowing down your topic by what research materials are available. Of course, you don\u2019t have time to read all<\/em> the thousands or even millions of webpages and articles that turn up in Google search results to determine which fulfill your (and your audience\u2019s) purposes. You skim.\r\n\r\nSuccessful skim-reading depends on the effective organization of the sources you\u2019re sorting through as well as your own time-management strategies. For articles, you would focus on the abstract or synopsis\u2014a paragraph that summarizes the entire piece and helps determine if it\u2019s what you\u2019re looking for. For webpages, you would read the very top and then skip down to see if the section headings indicate topics of interest; you can also do a word search (ctrl + f) if you\u2019re scanning for specific concepts. At the level of each paragraph, you rely on the first sentences representing the topic of the paragraph (see \u00a74.7<\/a> below for more on paragraph organization) so that you can skim the topic sentences, and perhaps the concluding sentences, to capture the main points and get a sense of how the content flows (Freedman, 2012<\/a>). Bolded key words and illustrations also help. (If your sources are effectively organized in this fashion, you can express your gratitude by paying it forward to your own readers. Organize your own writing so that you place main points strategically in topic sentences and highlight topics as subheadings. Your readers will be grateful if you help them to skim effectively.)\r\n\r\nWhen you find online sources relevant to your topic, best practice for preparing to document and use them properly is to collect them in an informal annotated bibliography. A formal annotated bibliography<\/strong> lists full bibliographical entries (see \u00a73.5<\/a> below) and a proper summary under each entry (see \u00a73.4.3<\/a> below); as a set of notes, on the other hand, an informal annotated bibliography need only include the source titles, web addresses (URLs that allow you to get back to the sources and collect more information about them later if you end up using them), and some summary points about the sources under each URL. When you begin your research investigation, however, you may want to collect only titles and URLs until you\u2019ve narrowed down a list of sources you think you\u2019ll use, then go back and confirm their relevance by writing some notes under each. (Getting some note-form points down on paper\u2014or on your word processor screen\u2014counts as your first step in the actual writing of your document, giving you a foundation to build on, as we shall see in Chapter 4<\/a> below.)\r\n\r\nThe most relevant and useful sources meet the needs of the audience you are preparing your document for. For this you must choose sources with the right amount of detail. You may find plenty of general sources that offer decent introductions (e.g., from Wikipedia<\/em>) but fall short of providing appropriate detail; in such cases you might be able to find more detailed coverage in the sources that they\u2019ve used if those introductory sources you found are credible for having properly documented their research in the first place. On the other end of the spectrum, sources such as peer-reviewed journal articles might offer a level of detail that far exceeds what you need along with content that goes way over your head; you may want to include these as mere citations if only to point readers in the direction of credible evidence for a minor point supporting a major point. In such cases, you should at least ensure that they indeed prove your point rather than prove something distantly related but not relevant enough to your topic.\r\n\r\nDuring this process you will encounter plenty of information in sources that may both confirm and contradict what you already know about your topic. It\u2019s important that you do what you\u2019re supposed to do as a student: keep an open mind and learn! Refrain from simply discarding contradictory information that will over-complicate your argument. If it turns out that a reputable source undermines your argument entirely, then this is the right point in the game to change your argument so that you don\u2019t end up embarrassing yourself in the end with a fantasy-driven document. If you\u2019re doing a research report into the viability of a waste-to-energy gasification facility, for instance, and you really want to say that it solves both your city\u2019s municipal garbage disposal and energy production needs, you don\u2019t want to find yourself too far down that road before addressing why no such facility has ever achieved profitable positive energy production. Ignoring such a record and the reasons why investors tend to avoid such opportunities, such as the failed Plasco plant in Ottawa (Chianello & Pearson, 2015)<\/a>, will undermine your credibility.\r\n\r\nAs a final word of warning, be careful with how you collect source content so that you don\u2019t accidentally plagiarize by the time you use the sources you\u2019ve collected in your final document. If you copy and paste text from sources into your notes as a basis for quotations or paraphrases, ensure that you put quotation marks around it and cite the page numbers (if the source has them) or paragraph numbers (if it doesn\u2019t have page numbers) in parentheses immediately following the closing quotation marks so you can properly cite them if you go on to use them later. If you don\u2019t put quotation marks around copied text, you run the risk of committing plagiarism by rolling unmarked quotations into your final document; even if you cite them, implying that you\u2019ve paraphrased when you\u2019ve really quoted still counts as a breach of academic integrity. We will return to the problem of plagiarism in the next section (\u00a73.4<\/a>) when we continue examining the process of building a document around research, but at this point it\u2019s worth reviewing your collection of research material to ensure that it meets the needs of the audience and works towards fulfilling the purpose you determined at the outset of the writing process.\r\n
\r\n

Key Takeaways<\/h3>\r\nNarrowing down a research topic involves skimming through database search results to select relevant sources, as well as skimming through source text to pull out main points that support your hypothesis by knowing where to find them.\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n
\r\n

Exercises<\/h3>\r\nBuilding on Exercise #1 in the previous section (\u00a73.2), develop the sources you found into an informal annotated bibliography with just titles and URLs for each source, as well as 2-3 main points in quotation marks pulled from the source text and bullet-listed under each URL.\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n
\r\n

References<\/h2>\r\nChianello, J., & Pearson, M. (2015, February 10). Ottawa severs ties with Plasco as company files for creditor protection<\/em>. Ottawa Citizen. Retrieved from http:\/\/ottawacitizen.com\/news\/local-news\/plasco-energy-group-files-for-creditor-protection<\/a>\r\n\r\nFreedman, L. (2012). Skimming and scanning<\/em>. Writing Advice. Retrieved from http:\/\/advice.writing.utoronto.ca\/researching\/skim-and-scan\/<\/a>\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n ","rendered":"
\n

Learning Objectives<\/h3>\n

4. Use effective reading strategies to collect and reframe information from a variety of written materials accurately.<\/p>\n

i. Separate main ideas from subordinate ideas in written materials.
\nii. Identify the organizational structure of a variety of written messages.
\niii. Read with a purpose to identify needed information.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Part of the process of identifying credible sources involves reading critically to find the best information available for your purposes, and those are whatever you\u2019ve determined your audience\u2019s needs to be. When collecting sources online by entering key terms into a search engine, examining the list of titles, and clicking on those that seem relevant, you begin the process of narrowing down your topic by what research materials are available. Of course, you don\u2019t have time to read all<\/em> the thousands or even millions of webpages and articles that turn up in Google search results to determine which fulfill your (and your audience\u2019s) purposes. You skim.<\/p>\n

Successful skim-reading depends on the effective organization of the sources you\u2019re sorting through as well as your own time-management strategies. For articles, you would focus on the abstract or synopsis\u2014a paragraph that summarizes the entire piece and helps determine if it\u2019s what you\u2019re looking for. For webpages, you would read the very top and then skip down to see if the section headings indicate topics of interest; you can also do a word search (ctrl + f) if you\u2019re scanning for specific concepts. At the level of each paragraph, you rely on the first sentences representing the topic of the paragraph (see \u00a74.7<\/a> below for more on paragraph organization) so that you can skim the topic sentences, and perhaps the concluding sentences, to capture the main points and get a sense of how the content flows (Freedman, 2012<\/a>). Bolded key words and illustrations also help. (If your sources are effectively organized in this fashion, you can express your gratitude by paying it forward to your own readers. Organize your own writing so that you place main points strategically in topic sentences and highlight topics as subheadings. Your readers will be grateful if you help them to skim effectively.)<\/p>\n

When you find online sources relevant to your topic, best practice for preparing to document and use them properly is to collect them in an informal annotated bibliography. A formal annotated bibliography<\/strong> lists full bibliographical entries (see \u00a73.5<\/a> below) and a proper summary under each entry (see \u00a73.4.3<\/a> below); as a set of notes, on the other hand, an informal annotated bibliography need only include the source titles, web addresses (URLs that allow you to get back to the sources and collect more information about them later if you end up using them), and some summary points about the sources under each URL. When you begin your research investigation, however, you may want to collect only titles and URLs until you\u2019ve narrowed down a list of sources you think you\u2019ll use, then go back and confirm their relevance by writing some notes under each. (Getting some note-form points down on paper\u2014or on your word processor screen\u2014counts as your first step in the actual writing of your document, giving you a foundation to build on, as we shall see in Chapter 4<\/a> below.)<\/p>\n

The most relevant and useful sources meet the needs of the audience you are preparing your document for. For this you must choose sources with the right amount of detail. You may find plenty of general sources that offer decent introductions (e.g., from Wikipedia<\/em>) but fall short of providing appropriate detail; in such cases you might be able to find more detailed coverage in the sources that they\u2019ve used if those introductory sources you found are credible for having properly documented their research in the first place. On the other end of the spectrum, sources such as peer-reviewed journal articles might offer a level of detail that far exceeds what you need along with content that goes way over your head; you may want to include these as mere citations if only to point readers in the direction of credible evidence for a minor point supporting a major point. In such cases, you should at least ensure that they indeed prove your point rather than prove something distantly related but not relevant enough to your topic.<\/p>\n

During this process you will encounter plenty of information in sources that may both confirm and contradict what you already know about your topic. It\u2019s important that you do what you\u2019re supposed to do as a student: keep an open mind and learn! Refrain from simply discarding contradictory information that will over-complicate your argument. If it turns out that a reputable source undermines your argument entirely, then this is the right point in the game to change your argument so that you don\u2019t end up embarrassing yourself in the end with a fantasy-driven document. If you\u2019re doing a research report into the viability of a waste-to-energy gasification facility, for instance, and you really want to say that it solves both your city\u2019s municipal garbage disposal and energy production needs, you don\u2019t want to find yourself too far down that road before addressing why no such facility has ever achieved profitable positive energy production. Ignoring such a record and the reasons why investors tend to avoid such opportunities, such as the failed Plasco plant in Ottawa (Chianello & Pearson, 2015)<\/a>, will undermine your credibility.<\/p>\n

As a final word of warning, be careful with how you collect source content so that you don\u2019t accidentally plagiarize by the time you use the sources you\u2019ve collected in your final document. If you copy and paste text from sources into your notes as a basis for quotations or paraphrases, ensure that you put quotation marks around it and cite the page numbers (if the source has them) or paragraph numbers (if it doesn\u2019t have page numbers) in parentheses immediately following the closing quotation marks so you can properly cite them if you go on to use them later. If you don\u2019t put quotation marks around copied text, you run the risk of committing plagiarism by rolling unmarked quotations into your final document; even if you cite them, implying that you\u2019ve paraphrased when you\u2019ve really quoted still counts as a breach of academic integrity. We will return to the problem of plagiarism in the next section (\u00a73.4<\/a>) when we continue examining the process of building a document around research, but at this point it\u2019s worth reviewing your collection of research material to ensure that it meets the needs of the audience and works towards fulfilling the purpose you determined at the outset of the writing process.<\/p>\n

\n

Key Takeaways<\/h3>\n

Narrowing down a research topic involves skimming through database search results to select relevant sources, as well as skimming through source text to pull out main points that support your hypothesis by knowing where to find them.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Exercises<\/h3>\n

Building on Exercise #1 in the previous section (\u00a73.2), develop the sources you found into an informal annotated bibliography with just titles and URLs for each source, as well as 2-3 main points in quotation marks pulled from the source text and bullet-listed under each URL.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

References<\/h2>\n

Chianello, J., & Pearson, M. (2015, February 10). Ottawa severs ties with Plasco as company files for creditor protection<\/em>. Ottawa Citizen. Retrieved from http:\/\/ottawacitizen.com\/news\/local-news\/plasco-energy-group-files-for-creditor-protection<\/a><\/p>\n

Freedman, L. (2012). Skimming and scanning<\/em>. Writing Advice. Retrieved from http:\/\/advice.writing.utoronto.ca\/researching\/skim-and-scan\/<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"menu_order":3,"template":"","meta":{"pb_show_title":"","pb_short_title":"","pb_subtitle":"","pb_authors":[],"pb_section_license":""},"chapter-type":[49],"contributor":[],"license":[],"class_list":["post-54","chapter","type-chapter","status-publish","hentry","chapter-type-numberless"],"part":49,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.library.torontomu.ca\/cmn279\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/54","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.library.torontomu.ca\/cmn279\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.library.torontomu.ca\/cmn279\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/chapter"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.library.torontomu.ca\/cmn279\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.library.torontomu.ca\/cmn279\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/54\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":243,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.library.torontomu.ca\/cmn279\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/54\/revisions\/243"}],"part":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.library.torontomu.ca\/cmn279\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/parts\/49"}],"metadata":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.library.torontomu.ca\/cmn279\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/54\/metadata\/"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.library.torontomu.ca\/cmn279\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=54"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"chapter-type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.library.torontomu.ca\/cmn279\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapter-type?post=54"},{"taxonomy":"contributor","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.library.torontomu.ca\/cmn279\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/contributor?post=54"},{"taxonomy":"license","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.library.torontomu.ca\/cmn279\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/license?post=54"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}