{"id":1357,"date":"2018-04-27T14:34:44","date_gmt":"2018-04-27T14:34:44","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/pressbooks.library.ryerson.ca\/pwaa\/?post_type=chapter&p=1357"},"modified":"2019-08-12T16:16:28","modified_gmt":"2019-08-12T16:16:28","slug":"self-test-4","status":"publish","type":"chapter","link":"https:\/\/pressbooks.library.torontomu.ca\/pwaa\/chapter\/self-test-4\/","title":{"raw":"Self-Test 4","rendered":"Self-Test 4"},"content":{"raw":"
\r\n
\r\n

Question 1<\/strong><\/h4>\r\nThe \u201cTab Key Navigation test\u201d is useful for identifying a variety of potential barriers. From those uses listed below, select all that the Tab Key Navigation test would identify.<\/strong>\r\n
    \r\n \t
  1. Focus visibility<\/li>\r\n \t
  2. Keyboard operability<\/li>\r\n \t
  3. Missing alt text<\/li>\r\n \t
  4. Focus order<\/li>\r\n \t
  5. Descriptive feedback<\/li>\r\n<\/ol>\r\n<\/div>\r\n
    \r\n

    Question 2<\/strong><\/h4>\r\nWhich of the following potential barriers would the \u201cSelect All test\u201d be useful in identifying? Select all that apply.<\/strong>\r\n
      \r\n \t
    1. Focus visibility<\/li>\r\n \t
    2. Keyboard operability<\/li>\r\n \t
    3. Missing alt text<\/li>\r\n \t
    4. Focus order<\/li>\r\n \t
    5. Descriptive feedback<\/li>\r\n<\/ol>\r\n<\/div>\r\n
      \r\n

      Question 3<\/strong><\/h4>\r\nTo examine the HTML markup associated with a potential barrier that has been identified using the Tab Key Navigation or Select All tests, a recommended approach would be to use:<\/strong>\r\n
        \r\n \t
      1. The browser\u2019s \u201cView Source\u201d function<\/li>\r\n \t
      2. The Browser\u2019s \u201cInspect Element\u201d function<\/li>\r\n \t
      3. Install and use the \u201cExamine Markup\u201d browser plugin<\/li>\r\n \t
      4. The W3C Markup Validator<\/li>\r\n \t
      5. Use the WebAIM toolbar\u2019s view source feature<\/li>\r\n<\/ol>\r\n<\/div>\r\n
        \r\n

        Question 4<\/strong><\/h4>\r\nWhen reviewing video content for accessibility, which of the following alternatives does WCAG 2.0 suggest should be provided? Select all that apply.<\/strong>\r\n
          \r\n \t
        1. An alternative slideshow for those who do not have a video player<\/li>\r\n \t
        2. Captioning<\/li>\r\n \t
        3. A downloadable PDF version<\/li>\r\n \t
        4. A downloadable slideshow version<\/li>\r\n \t
        5. A transcript<\/li>\r\n \t
        6. Audio description<\/li>\r\n<\/ol>\r\n<\/div>\r\n

          Answers to Self-Test 4<\/a><\/p>\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n \r\n\r\n[h5p id=\"4\"]","rendered":"

          \n
          \n

          Question 1<\/strong><\/h4>\n

          The \u201cTab Key Navigation test\u201d is useful for identifying a variety of potential barriers. From those uses listed below, select all that the Tab Key Navigation test would identify.<\/strong><\/p>\n

            \n
          1. Focus visibility<\/li>\n
          2. Keyboard operability<\/li>\n
          3. Missing alt text<\/li>\n
          4. Focus order<\/li>\n
          5. Descriptive feedback<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/div>\n
            \n

            Question 2<\/strong><\/h4>\n

            Which of the following potential barriers would the \u201cSelect All test\u201d be useful in identifying? Select all that apply.<\/strong><\/p>\n

              \n
            1. Focus visibility<\/li>\n
            2. Keyboard operability<\/li>\n
            3. Missing alt text<\/li>\n
            4. Focus order<\/li>\n
            5. Descriptive feedback<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/div>\n
              \n

              Question 3<\/strong><\/h4>\n

              To examine the HTML markup associated with a potential barrier that has been identified using the Tab Key Navigation or Select All tests, a recommended approach would be to use:<\/strong><\/p>\n

                \n
              1. The browser\u2019s \u201cView Source\u201d function<\/li>\n
              2. The Browser\u2019s \u201cInspect Element\u201d function<\/li>\n
              3. Install and use the \u201cExamine Markup\u201d browser plugin<\/li>\n
              4. The W3C Markup Validator<\/li>\n
              5. Use the WebAIM toolbar\u2019s view source feature<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/div>\n
                \n

                Question 4<\/strong><\/h4>\n

                When reviewing video content for accessibility, which of the following alternatives does WCAG 2.0 suggest should be provided? Select all that apply.<\/strong><\/p>\n

                  \n
                1. An alternative slideshow for those who do not have a video player<\/li>\n
                2. Captioning<\/li>\n
                3. A downloadable PDF version<\/li>\n
                4. A downloadable slideshow version<\/li>\n
                5. A transcript<\/li>\n
                6. Audio description<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/div>\n

                  Answers to Self-Test 4<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

                   <\/p>\n

                  \n