{"id":161,"date":"2021-11-03T12:51:39","date_gmt":"2021-11-03T16:51:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/pressbooks.library.ryerson.ca\/thebigsea\/?post_type=chapter&p=161"},"modified":"2022-01-28T10:42:14","modified_gmt":"2022-01-28T15:42:14","slug":"when-the-negro-was-in-vogue","status":"publish","type":"chapter","link":"https:\/\/pressbooks.library.torontomu.ca\/thebigsea\/chapter\/when-the-negro-was-in-vogue\/","title":{"raw":"When the Negro was in Vogue","rendered":"When the Negro was in Vogue"},"content":{"raw":"

The 1920\u2019s were the years of Manhattan\u2019s black Renaissance. It began with Shuffle Along<\/span>, Running Wild<\/span>, and the Charleston. Perhaps some people would say even with The Emperor Jones<\/span>, Charles Gilpin, and the tom-toms at the Provincetown. But certainly it was the musical revue, Shuffle Along<\/span>, that gave a scintillating send-off to that Negro vogue in Manhattan, which reached its peak just before the crash of 1929, the crash that sent Negroes, white folks, and all rolling down the hill toward the Works Progress Administration.<\/p>\r\n

Shuffle Along<\/span> was a honey of a show. Swift, bright, funny, rollicking, and gay, with a dozen danceable, singable tunes. Besides, look who were in it: The now famous choir director, Hall Johnson, and the composer, William Grant Still, were a part of the orchestra. Eubie Blake and Noble Sissle wrote the music and played and acted in the show. Miller and Lyles were the comics. Florence Mills skyrocketed to fame in the second act. Trixie Smith sang \u201cHe May Be Your Man But He Comes to See Me Sometimes.\u201d And Caterina Jarboro, now a European prima donna, and the internationally celebrated Josephine Baker were merely in the chorus. Everybody was in the audience\u2014including me. People came back to see it innumerable times. It was always packed.<\/p>\r\n

To see Shuffle Along<\/span> was the main reason I wanted to go to Columbia. When I saw it, I was thrilled and delighted. From then on I was in the gallery of the Cort Theatre every time I got a chance. That year, too, I saw Katharine Cornell in A Bill of Divorcement<\/span>, Margaret Wycherly in The Verge<\/span>, Maugham\u2019s The Circle<\/span> with Mrs. Leslie Carter, and the Theatre Guild production of Kaiser\u2019s From Morn Till Midnight<\/span>. But I remember Shuffle Along<\/span> best of all. It gave just the proper push\u2014a pre-Charleston kick\u2014to that Negro vogue of the 20\u2019s, that spread to books, African sculpture, music, and dancing.<\/p>\r\n

Put down the 1920\u2019s for the rise of Roland Hayes, who packed Carnegie Hall, the rise of Paul Robeson in New York and London, of Florence Mills over two continents, of Rose McClendon in Broadway parts that never measured up to her, the booming voice of Bessie Smith and the low moan of Clara on thousands of records, and the rise of that grand comedienne of song, Ethel Waters, singing: \u201cCharlie\u2019s elected now! He\u2019s in right for sure!\u201d Put down the 1920\u2019s for Louis Armstrong and Gladys Bentley and Josephine Baker.<\/p>\r\n

White people began to come to Harlem in droves. For several years they packed the expensive Cotton Club on Lenox Avenue. But I was never there, because the Cotton Club was a Jim Crow club for gangsters and monied whites. They were not cordial to Negro patronage, unless you were a celebrity like Bojangles. So Harlem Negroes did not like the Cotton Club and never appreciated its Jim Crow policy in the very heart of their dark community. Nor did ordinary Negroes like the growing influx of whites toward Harlem after sundown, flooding the little cabarets and bars where formerly only colored people laughed and sang, and where now the strangers were given the best ringside tables to sit and stare at the Negro customers\u2014like amusing animals in a zoo.<\/p>\r\n

The Negroes said: \u201cWe can\u2019t go downtown and sit and stare at you in your clubs. You won\u2019t even let us in your clubs.\u201d But they didn\u2019t say it out loud\u2014for Negroes are practically never rude to white people. So thousands of whites came to Harlem night after night, thinking the Negroes loved to have them there, and firmly believing that all Harlemites left their houses at sundown to sing and dance in cabarets, because most of the whites saw nothing but the cabarets, not the houses.<\/p>\r\n

Some of the owners of Harlem clubs, delighted at the flood of white patronage, made the grievous error of barring their own race, after the manner of the famous Cotton Club. But most of these quickly lost business and folded up, because they failed to realize that a large part of the Harlem attraction for downtown New Yorkers lay in simply watching the colored customers amuse themselves. And the smaller clubs, of course, had no big floor shows or a name band like the Cotton Club, where Duke Ellington usually held forth, so, without black patronage, they were not amusing at all.<\/p>\r\n

Some of the small clubs, however, had people like Gladys Bentley, who was something worth discovering in those days, before she got famous, acquired an accompanist, specially written material, and conscious vulgarity. But for two or three amazing years, Miss Bentley sat, and played a big piano all night long, literally all night, without stopping\u2014singing songs like \u201cThe St. James Infirmary,\u201d from ten in the evening until dawn, with scarcely a break between the notes, sliding from one song to another, with a powerful and continuous underbeat of jungle rhythm. Miss Bentley was an amazing exhibition of musical energy\u2014a large, dark, masculine lady, whose feet pounded the floor while her fingers pounded the keyboard\u2014a perfect piece of African sculpture, animated by her own rhythm.<\/p>\r\n

But when the place where she played became too well known, she began to sing with an accompanist, became a star, moved to a larger place, then downtown, and is now in Hollywood. The old magic of the woman and the piano and the night and the rhythm being one is gone. But everything goes, one way or another. The \u201920\u2019s are gone and lots of fine things in Harlem night life have disappeared like snow in the sun\u2014since it became utterly commercial, planned for the downtown tourist trade, and therefore dull.<\/p>\r\n

The lindy-hoppers at the Savoy even began to practise acrobatic routines, and to do absurd things for the entertainment of the whites, that probably never would have entered their heads to attempt merely for their own effortless amusement. Some of the lindy-hoppers had cards printed with their names on them and became dance professors teaching the tourists. Then Harlem nights became show nights for the Nordics.<\/p>\r\n

Some critics say that that is what happened to certain Negro writers, too\u2014that they ceased to write to amuse themselves and began to write to amuse and entertain white people, and in so doing distorted and over-colored their material, and left out a great many things they thought would offend their American brothers of a lighter complexion. Maybe\u2014since Negroes have writer-racketeers, as has any other race. But I have known almost all of them, and most of the good ones have tried to be honest, write honestly, and express their world as they saw it.<\/p>\r\n

All of us know that the gay and sparkling life of the so-called Negro Renaissance of the \u201920\u2019s was not so gay and sparkling beneath the surface as it looked. Carl Van Vechten, in the character of Byron in Nigger Heaven<\/span>, captured some of the bitterness and frustration of literary Harlem that Wallace Thurman later so effectively poured into his Infants of the Spring<\/span>\u2014the only novel by a Negro about that fantastic period when Harlem was in vogue.<\/p>\r\n

It was a period when, at almost every Harlem upper-crust dance or party, one would be introduced to various distinguished white celebrities there as guests. It was a period when almost any Harlem Negro of any social importance at all would be likely to say casually: \u201cAs I was remarking the other day to Heywood\u2014,\u201d meaning Heywood Broun. Or: \u201cAs I said to George\u2014,\u201d referring to George Gershwin. It was a period when local and visiting royalty were not at all uncommon in Harlem. And when the parties of A\u2019Lelia Walker, the Negro heiress, were filled with guests whose names would turn any Nordic social climber green with envy. It was a period when Harold Jackman, a handsome young Harlem school teacher of modest means, calmly announced one day that he was sailing for the Riviera for a fortnight, to attend Princess Murat\u2019s yachting party. It was a period when Charleston preachers opened up shouting churches as sideshows for white tourists. It was a period when at least one charming colored chorus girl, amber enough to pass for a Latin American, was living in a penthouse, with all her bills paid by a gentleman whose name was banker\u2019s magic on Wall Street. It was a period when every season there was at least one hit play on Broadway acted by a Negro cast. And when books by Negro authors were being published with much greater frequency and much more publicity than ever before or since in history. It was a period when white writers wrote about Negroes more successfully (commercially speaking) than Negroes did about themselves. It was the period (God help us!) when Ethel Barrymore appeared in blackface in Scarlet Sister Mary<\/span>! It was the period when the Negro was in vogue.<\/p>\r\n

I was there. I had a swell time while it lasted. But I thought it wouldn\u2019t last long. (I remember the vogue for things Russian, the season the Chauve-Souris first came to town.) For how could a large and enthusiastic number of people be crazy about Negroes forever? But some Harlemites thought the millennium had come. They thought the race problem had at last been solved through Art plus Gladys Bentley. They were sure the New Negro would lead a new life from then on in green pastures of tolerance created by Countee Cullen, Ethel Waters, Claude McKay, Duke Ellington, Bojangles, and Alain Locke.<\/p>\r\n

I don\u2019t know what made any Negroes think that\u2014except that they were mostly intellectuals doing the thinking. The ordinary Negroes hadn\u2019t heard of the Negro Renaissance. And if they had, it hadn\u2019t raised their wages any. As for all those white folks in the speakeasies and night clubs of Harlem\u2014well, maybe a colored man could find some<\/span> place to have a drink that the tourists hadn\u2019t yet discovered.<\/p>\r\n

Then it was that house-rent parties began to flourish\u2014and not always to raise the rent either. But, as often as not, to have a get-together of one\u2019s own, where you could do the black-bottom with no stranger behind you trying to do it, too. Non-theatrical, non-intellectual Harlem was an unwilling victim of its own vogue. It didn\u2019t like to be stared at by white folks. But perhaps the downtowners never knew this\u2014for the cabaret owners, the entertainers, and the speakeasy proprietors treated them fine\u2014as long as they paid.<\/p>\r\n

The Saturday night rent parties that I attended were often more amusing than any night club, in small apartments where God knows who lived\u2014because the guests seldom did\u2014but where the piano would often be augmented by a guitar, or an odd cornet, or somebody with a pair of drums walking in off the street. And where awful bootleg whiskey and good fried fish or steaming chitterling were sold at very low prices. And the dancing and singing and impromptu entertaining went on until dawn came in at the windows.<\/p>\r\n

These parties, often termed whist parties or dances, were usually announced by brightly colored cards stuck in the grille of apartment house elevators. Some of the cards were highly entertaining in themselves:<\/p>\r\n\r\n

\"\"<\/div>\r\n
\"\"<\/div>\r\n
\"\"<\/div>\r\n
\"\"<\/div>\r\n
\"\"<\/div>\r\n
\"\"<\/div>\r\n
\"\"<\/div>\r\n

Almost every Saturday night when I was in Harlem I went to a house-rent party. I wrote lots of poems about house-rent parties, and ate thereat many a fried fish and pig\u2019s foot\u2014with liquid refreshments on the side. I met ladies\u2019 maids and truck drivers, laundry workers and shoe shine boys, seamstresses and porters. I can still hear their laughter in my ears, hear the soft slow music, and feel the floor shaking as the dancers danced.<\/p>","rendered":"

The 1920\u2019s were the years of Manhattan\u2019s black Renaissance. It began with Shuffle Along<\/span>, Running Wild<\/span>, and the Charleston. Perhaps some people would say even with The Emperor Jones<\/span>, Charles Gilpin, and the tom-toms at the Provincetown. But certainly it was the musical revue, Shuffle Along<\/span>, that gave a scintillating send-off to that Negro vogue in Manhattan, which reached its peak just before the crash of 1929, the crash that sent Negroes, white folks, and all rolling down the hill toward the Works Progress Administration.<\/p>\n

Shuffle Along<\/span> was a honey of a show. Swift, bright, funny, rollicking, and gay, with a dozen danceable, singable tunes. Besides, look who were in it: The now famous choir director, Hall Johnson, and the composer, William Grant Still, were a part of the orchestra. Eubie Blake and Noble Sissle wrote the music and played and acted in the show. Miller and Lyles were the comics. Florence Mills skyrocketed to fame in the second act. Trixie Smith sang \u201cHe May Be Your Man But He Comes to See Me Sometimes.\u201d And Caterina Jarboro, now a European prima donna, and the internationally celebrated Josephine Baker were merely in the chorus. Everybody was in the audience\u2014including me. People came back to see it innumerable times. It was always packed.<\/p>\n

To see Shuffle Along<\/span> was the main reason I wanted to go to Columbia. When I saw it, I was thrilled and delighted. From then on I was in the gallery of the Cort Theatre every time I got a chance. That year, too, I saw Katharine Cornell in A Bill of Divorcement<\/span>, Margaret Wycherly in The Verge<\/span>, Maugham\u2019s The Circle<\/span> with Mrs. Leslie Carter, and the Theatre Guild production of Kaiser\u2019s From Morn Till Midnight<\/span>. But I remember Shuffle Along<\/span> best of all. It gave just the proper push\u2014a pre-Charleston kick\u2014to that Negro vogue of the 20\u2019s, that spread to books, African sculpture, music, and dancing.<\/p>\n

Put down the 1920\u2019s for the rise of Roland Hayes, who packed Carnegie Hall, the rise of Paul Robeson in New York and London, of Florence Mills over two continents, of Rose McClendon in Broadway parts that never measured up to her, the booming voice of Bessie Smith and the low moan of Clara on thousands of records, and the rise of that grand comedienne of song, Ethel Waters, singing: \u201cCharlie\u2019s elected now! He\u2019s in right for sure!\u201d Put down the 1920\u2019s for Louis Armstrong and Gladys Bentley and Josephine Baker.<\/p>\n

White people began to come to Harlem in droves. For several years they packed the expensive Cotton Club on Lenox Avenue. But I was never there, because the Cotton Club was a Jim Crow club for gangsters and monied whites. They were not cordial to Negro patronage, unless you were a celebrity like Bojangles. So Harlem Negroes did not like the Cotton Club and never appreciated its Jim Crow policy in the very heart of their dark community. Nor did ordinary Negroes like the growing influx of whites toward Harlem after sundown, flooding the little cabarets and bars where formerly only colored people laughed and sang, and where now the strangers were given the best ringside tables to sit and stare at the Negro customers\u2014like amusing animals in a zoo.<\/p>\n

The Negroes said: \u201cWe can\u2019t go downtown and sit and stare at you in your clubs. You won\u2019t even let us in your clubs.\u201d But they didn\u2019t say it out loud\u2014for Negroes are practically never rude to white people. So thousands of whites came to Harlem night after night, thinking the Negroes loved to have them there, and firmly believing that all Harlemites left their houses at sundown to sing and dance in cabarets, because most of the whites saw nothing but the cabarets, not the houses.<\/p>\n

Some of the owners of Harlem clubs, delighted at the flood of white patronage, made the grievous error of barring their own race, after the manner of the famous Cotton Club. But most of these quickly lost business and folded up, because they failed to realize that a large part of the Harlem attraction for downtown New Yorkers lay in simply watching the colored customers amuse themselves. And the smaller clubs, of course, had no big floor shows or a name band like the Cotton Club, where Duke Ellington usually held forth, so, without black patronage, they were not amusing at all.<\/p>\n

Some of the small clubs, however, had people like Gladys Bentley, who was something worth discovering in those days, before she got famous, acquired an accompanist, specially written material, and conscious vulgarity. But for two or three amazing years, Miss Bentley sat, and played a big piano all night long, literally all night, without stopping\u2014singing songs like \u201cThe St. James Infirmary,\u201d from ten in the evening until dawn, with scarcely a break between the notes, sliding from one song to another, with a powerful and continuous underbeat of jungle rhythm. Miss Bentley was an amazing exhibition of musical energy\u2014a large, dark, masculine lady, whose feet pounded the floor while her fingers pounded the keyboard\u2014a perfect piece of African sculpture, animated by her own rhythm.<\/p>\n

But when the place where she played became too well known, she began to sing with an accompanist, became a star, moved to a larger place, then downtown, and is now in Hollywood. The old magic of the woman and the piano and the night and the rhythm being one is gone. But everything goes, one way or another. The \u201920\u2019s are gone and lots of fine things in Harlem night life have disappeared like snow in the sun\u2014since it became utterly commercial, planned for the downtown tourist trade, and therefore dull.<\/p>\n

The lindy-hoppers at the Savoy even began to practise acrobatic routines, and to do absurd things for the entertainment of the whites, that probably never would have entered their heads to attempt merely for their own effortless amusement. Some of the lindy-hoppers had cards printed with their names on them and became dance professors teaching the tourists. Then Harlem nights became show nights for the Nordics.<\/p>\n

Some critics say that that is what happened to certain Negro writers, too\u2014that they ceased to write to amuse themselves and began to write to amuse and entertain white people, and in so doing distorted and over-colored their material, and left out a great many things they thought would offend their American brothers of a lighter complexion. Maybe\u2014since Negroes have writer-racketeers, as has any other race. But I have known almost all of them, and most of the good ones have tried to be honest, write honestly, and express their world as they saw it.<\/p>\n

All of us know that the gay and sparkling life of the so-called Negro Renaissance of the \u201920\u2019s was not so gay and sparkling beneath the surface as it looked. Carl Van Vechten, in the character of Byron in Nigger Heaven<\/span>, captured some of the bitterness and frustration of literary Harlem that Wallace Thurman later so effectively poured into his Infants of the Spring<\/span>\u2014the only novel by a Negro about that fantastic period when Harlem was in vogue.<\/p>\n

It was a period when, at almost every Harlem upper-crust dance or party, one would be introduced to various distinguished white celebrities there as guests. It was a period when almost any Harlem Negro of any social importance at all would be likely to say casually: \u201cAs I was remarking the other day to Heywood\u2014,\u201d meaning Heywood Broun. Or: \u201cAs I said to George\u2014,\u201d referring to George Gershwin. It was a period when local and visiting royalty were not at all uncommon in Harlem. And when the parties of A\u2019Lelia Walker, the Negro heiress, were filled with guests whose names would turn any Nordic social climber green with envy. It was a period when Harold Jackman, a handsome young Harlem school teacher of modest means, calmly announced one day that he was sailing for the Riviera for a fortnight, to attend Princess Murat\u2019s yachting party. It was a period when Charleston preachers opened up shouting churches as sideshows for white tourists. It was a period when at least one charming colored chorus girl, amber enough to pass for a Latin American, was living in a penthouse, with all her bills paid by a gentleman whose name was banker\u2019s magic on Wall Street. It was a period when every season there was at least one hit play on Broadway acted by a Negro cast. And when books by Negro authors were being published with much greater frequency and much more publicity than ever before or since in history. It was a period when white writers wrote about Negroes more successfully (commercially speaking) than Negroes did about themselves. It was the period (God help us!) when Ethel Barrymore appeared in blackface in Scarlet Sister Mary<\/span>! It was the period when the Negro was in vogue.<\/p>\n

I was there. I had a swell time while it lasted. But I thought it wouldn\u2019t last long. (I remember the vogue for things Russian, the season the Chauve-Souris first came to town.) For how could a large and enthusiastic number of people be crazy about Negroes forever? But some Harlemites thought the millennium had come. They thought the race problem had at last been solved through Art plus Gladys Bentley. They were sure the New Negro would lead a new life from then on in green pastures of tolerance created by Countee Cullen, Ethel Waters, Claude McKay, Duke Ellington, Bojangles, and Alain Locke.<\/p>\n

I don\u2019t know what made any Negroes think that\u2014except that they were mostly intellectuals doing the thinking. The ordinary Negroes hadn\u2019t heard of the Negro Renaissance. And if they had, it hadn\u2019t raised their wages any. As for all those white folks in the speakeasies and night clubs of Harlem\u2014well, maybe a colored man could find some<\/span> place to have a drink that the tourists hadn\u2019t yet discovered.<\/p>\n

Then it was that house-rent parties began to flourish\u2014and not always to raise the rent either. But, as often as not, to have a get-together of one\u2019s own, where you could do the black-bottom with no stranger behind you trying to do it, too. Non-theatrical, non-intellectual Harlem was an unwilling victim of its own vogue. It didn\u2019t like to be stared at by white folks. But perhaps the downtowners never knew this\u2014for the cabaret owners, the entertainers, and the speakeasy proprietors treated them fine\u2014as long as they paid.<\/p>\n

The Saturday night rent parties that I attended were often more amusing than any night club, in small apartments where God knows who lived\u2014because the guests seldom did\u2014but where the piano would often be augmented by a guitar, or an odd cornet, or somebody with a pair of drums walking in off the street. And where awful bootleg whiskey and good fried fish or steaming chitterling were sold at very low prices. And the dancing and singing and impromptu entertaining went on until dawn came in at the windows.<\/p>\n

These parties, often termed whist parties or dances, were usually announced by brightly colored cards stuck in the grille of apartment house elevators. Some of the cards were highly entertaining in themselves:<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/div>\n
\"\"<\/div>\n
\"\"<\/div>\n
\"\"<\/div>\n
\"\"<\/div>\n
\"\"<\/div>\n
\"\"<\/div>\n

Almost every Saturday night when I was in Harlem I went to a house-rent party. I wrote lots of poems about house-rent parties, and ate thereat many a fried fish and pig\u2019s foot\u2014with liquid refreshments on the side. I met ladies\u2019 maids and truck drivers, laundry workers and shoe shine boys, seamstresses and porters. I can still hear their laughter in my ears, hear the soft slow music, and feel the floor shaking as the dancers danced.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":299,"menu_order":1,"template":"","meta":{"pb_show_title":"on","pb_short_title":"","pb_subtitle":"","pb_authors":[],"pb_section_license":""},"chapter-type":[49],"contributor":[],"license":[],"class_list":["post-161","chapter","type-chapter","status-publish","hentry","chapter-type-numberless"],"part":101,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.library.torontomu.ca\/thebigsea\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/161","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.library.torontomu.ca\/thebigsea\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.library.torontomu.ca\/thebigsea\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/chapter"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.library.torontomu.ca\/thebigsea\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/299"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.library.torontomu.ca\/thebigsea\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/161\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":302,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.library.torontomu.ca\/thebigsea\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/161\/revisions\/302"}],"part":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.library.torontomu.ca\/thebigsea\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/parts\/101"}],"metadata":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.library.torontomu.ca\/thebigsea\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/161\/metadata\/"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.library.torontomu.ca\/thebigsea\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=161"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"chapter-type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.library.torontomu.ca\/thebigsea\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapter-type?post=161"},{"taxonomy":"contributor","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.library.torontomu.ca\/thebigsea\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/contributor?post=161"},{"taxonomy":"license","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.library.torontomu.ca\/thebigsea\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/license?post=161"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}