{"id":1001,"date":"2018-05-25T14:32:34","date_gmt":"2018-05-25T14:32:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/pressbooks.library.ryerson.ca\/writehere\/?post_type=chapter&p=1001"},"modified":"2018-07-13T17:27:19","modified_gmt":"2018-07-13T17:27:19","slug":"complete-the-essay-self-evaluation-of-your-two-storey-thesis-below","status":"publish","type":"chapter","link":"https:\/\/pressbooks.library.torontomu.ca\/writehere\/chapter\/complete-the-essay-self-evaluation-of-your-two-storey-thesis-below\/","title":{"raw":"Complete the Essay Self-Evaluation of Your Two-Storey Thesis Below.","rendered":"Complete the Essay Self-Evaluation of Your Two-Storey Thesis Below."},"content":{"raw":"
\r\n

Taking Measure<\/h3>\r\nPlease complete this self-evaluation of the two-storey thesis you wrote in Chapter 7.<\/span>\r\n\r\nEach question requires a \u201cYes\u201d or \u201cNo\u201d answer. For each \u201cYes\u201d response, give yourself one point. Your final score will be a mark out of eleven (eg.: ten \u201cYes\u201d responses = 10\/11).\r\n\r\n \r\n\r\nComponents<\/span>\r\n\r\nDid you narrow your approach from the general prompt to a specific, concrete focus?\r\n\r\nY\/N\r\n\r\nDid you identify two specific pieces of evidence?\r\n\r\nY\/N\r\n\r\nDid you concentrate in both storeys on your central document and its concrete elements?\r\n\r\nY\/N\r\n\r\n \r\n\r\nFirst Storey: Evidence\/Observations<\/span>\r\n\r\nIs the first piece of evidence something you can literally point to in the document?\r\n\r\nY\/N\r\n\r\nIs the second piece of evidence something you can literally point to in the document?\r\n\r\nY\/N\r\n\r\nDoes each piece of evidence add something new?\r\n\r\nY\/N\r\n\r\n \r\n\r\nSecond Storey: Argument<\/span>\r\n\r\nHave you provided a specific interpretation of the concrete evidence in your first storey?\r\n\r\nY\/N\r\n\r\nAre you still concentrating on the evidence itself, instead of overlooking it in favour of a more general discussion?\r\n\r\nY\/N\r\n\r\nIs your argument controversial? Is it possible for the reader to disagree with it?\r\n\r\nY\/N\r\n\r\n \r\n\r\nStyle<\/span>\r\n\r\nDid you avoid the use of first- or second-person pronouns? (I, we, us, our, etc.)\r\n\r\nY\/N\r\n\r\nDid you avoid words from the Ctrl-F list? (society, technology, people, etc.)\r\n\r\nY\/N\r\n\r\n<\/div>","rendered":"
\n

Taking Measure<\/h3>\n

Please complete this self-evaluation of the two-storey thesis you wrote in Chapter 7.<\/span><\/p>\n

Each question requires a \u201cYes\u201d or \u201cNo\u201d answer. For each \u201cYes\u201d response, give yourself one point. Your final score will be a mark out of eleven (eg.: ten \u201cYes\u201d responses = 10\/11).<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Components<\/span><\/p>\n

Did you narrow your approach from the general prompt to a specific, concrete focus?<\/p>\n

Y\/N<\/p>\n

Did you identify two specific pieces of evidence?<\/p>\n

Y\/N<\/p>\n

Did you concentrate in both storeys on your central document and its concrete elements?<\/p>\n

Y\/N<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

First Storey: Evidence\/Observations<\/span><\/p>\n

Is the first piece of evidence something you can literally point to in the document?<\/p>\n

Y\/N<\/p>\n

Is the second piece of evidence something you can literally point to in the document?<\/p>\n

Y\/N<\/p>\n

Does each piece of evidence add something new?<\/p>\n

Y\/N<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Second Storey: Argument<\/span><\/p>\n

Have you provided a specific interpretation of the concrete evidence in your first storey?<\/p>\n

Y\/N<\/p>\n

Are you still concentrating on the evidence itself, instead of overlooking it in favour of a more general discussion?<\/p>\n

Y\/N<\/p>\n

Is your argument controversial? Is it possible for the reader to disagree with it?<\/p>\n

Y\/N<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Style<\/span><\/p>\n

Did you avoid the use of first- or second-person pronouns? (I, we, us, our, etc.)<\/p>\n

Y\/N<\/p>\n

Did you avoid words from the Ctrl-F list? (society, technology, people, etc.)<\/p>\n

Y\/N<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":87,"menu_order":3,"template":"","meta":{"pb_show_title":"on","pb_short_title":"","pb_subtitle":"","pb_authors":[],"pb_section_license":""},"chapter-type":[],"contributor":[],"license":[],"class_list":["post-1001","chapter","type-chapter","status-publish","hentry"],"part":993,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.library.torontomu.ca\/writehere\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/1001","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.library.torontomu.ca\/writehere\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.library.torontomu.ca\/writehere\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/chapter"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.library.torontomu.ca\/writehere\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/87"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.library.torontomu.ca\/writehere\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/1001\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2046,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.library.torontomu.ca\/writehere\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/1001\/revisions\/2046"}],"part":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.library.torontomu.ca\/writehere\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/parts\/993"}],"metadata":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.library.torontomu.ca\/writehere\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/1001\/metadata\/"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.library.torontomu.ca\/writehere\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1001"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"chapter-type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.library.torontomu.ca\/writehere\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapter-type?post=1001"},{"taxonomy":"contributor","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.library.torontomu.ca\/writehere\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/contributor?post=1001"},{"taxonomy":"license","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.library.torontomu.ca\/writehere\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/license?post=1001"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}