References

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Data Archive (ATSIDA). (n.d.). Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Data Archive. ATSIDA: Aboriginal & Torres Strait Islander Data Archive.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Data Archive (ATSIDA). (n.d.). ATSIDA Protocols for the Preservation, Access, Reuse and Repatriation of Research Data relating to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities.

Adelson, N., & Mickelson, S. (2022). The Miiyupimatisiiun Research Data Archives Project: Putting OCAP^® principles into practice, Digital Library Perspectives, 38(4), 508-520. https://doi.org/10.1108/DLP-11-2021-0099

​Adelson, N., Mickelson, S., & Kawapit, J. J. (2021). The Miiyupimatisiiun Research Data Archives Project: Co-developing an Indigenous data repository, KULA: Knowledge Creation, Dissemination, and Preservation Studies, 5(1) 1–6.

Alaska Native Knowledge Network. (2006). Alaska Federation of Natives Guidelines for Research.

Alcock, D., Elgie, J., Richmond, C., & White, J. (2017). Developing Ethical Research Practices Between Institutional and Community Partners: A Look at the Current Base of Literature Surrounding Memorandums of Understanding in Canada. The International Indigenous Policy Journal, 8(4).

American Philosophical Society. (2014). The American Philosophical Society Protocols for the Treatment of Indigenous Materials. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 158(4).

Anderson, J. (2005). Correcting Course: Rebalancing Copyright for Libraries in the National and International Arena. American Library Association and the MacArthur Foundation.

Anderson, J., & Christen, K. (2019). Decolonizing Attribution: Traditions of Exclusion. Journal of Radical Librarianship, 5(2019), 113-152.

Anderson, J., & Hudson, M. (2021, April 23). Operationalizing Indigenous Data Sovereignty: Traditional Knowledge and Biocultural Labels and Notices Initiative. Access video recording.

Archive/Counter-Archive. (n.d.). archive counterarchive. Archive.

Archive/Counter-Archive. (n.d.). Case Studies.

Archive/Counter-Archive. (n.d.). Indigenous Methodologies.

Assembly of First Nations. (2009). Ethics in First Nations Research. Ottawa: Assembly of First Nations.

Association of Tribal Archives, Libraries, and Museums. (2012). Sustaining Indigenous Culture: The Structure, Activities and Needs of Tribal Archives, Libraries and Museums.

Association of Tribal Archives, Libraries, and Museums (ATALM). (n.d.). ATALM: Association of Tribal Archives, Libraries, and Museums. Advancing Indigenous Cultural Organizations.

Attendees of the NDSF Summit. (2020). Kanata Declaration 2020. National Data Services Framework Summit 2020 (NDSF 2020), Kanata, Ontario. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4002076

Australian Government Department of Social Services. (2013). Fact sheet 6: Longitudinal study of Indigenous Children Data Protocols.

Bastian, J. (2002). Taking custody, giving access: A postcustodial role for a new century. Archivaria, 53, 76-93.

Baxter, T., Callison, C., Cherry, A., & Pringle, J. (2019, October 9). Reconciliation in Action: Practical Projects that are Making a Difference.

Blake, D., Martin, L., & Pelletier, D. (2004). Report and Recommendations of the Consultation on Aboriginal Resources and Services. Library and Archives Canada.

Bliss, H., Genee, I., Junker, M. O., & O’Donnell, D. P. (2020). “Credit where credit is due”: Authorship and attribution in Algonquian language digital resources. IDEAH.

Blue Quills First Nations College. (2009). Blue Quills First Nations College Research Ethics Policy.

Branch, C., & M. (2021, January 21). Tri-Agency Statement of Principles on Digital Data Management. Science.gc.ca. Retrieved 2022, from Tri-Agency Statement of Principles on Digital Data Management – Science.gc.ca.

Branch, C., & M. (2021, March 15). Tri-Agency Research Data Management Policy. Science.gc.ca. Retrieved 2022, from Tri-Agency Research Data Management Policy – Science.gc.ca​.

British Columbia First Nations’ Data Governance Initiative. (n.d.). Indigenous Nations Asserting Data Sovereignty.

British Columbia First Nations Data Governance Initiative. (n.d.). Indigenous Information Governance: Regional Information Governance Centre Concept Paper-BC.

Brunger, F., Schiff, R., Morton-Ninomiya, M., & Bull, J. (2014). Animating the concept of “ethical space”: The Labrador Aboriginal Health Research Committee Ethics Workshop. International Journal of Indigenous Health, 10(1).​

​Bull, J. (2016). A Two-eyed seeing approach to research ethics review: An Indigenous perspective. In W. C. Van den Hoonaard & A. Hamilton (Eds.), The Ethics Rupture: Exploring Alternative to Formal Research Ethics Review. University of Toronto Press.

Bull, J., Beazley, K., Shea, J., MacQuarrie, C., Hudson, A., Shaw, K., Brunger, F., Kavanagh, C., Gagne, B. (2019). Shifting practise: Recognizing Indigenous rights holders in research ethics review. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management, 15(1), 21-35.

Bull, J. & Hudson, A. (2018). Research governance in NunatuKavut: Engagement, Expectations and Evolution. International Journal of Circumpolar Health, 78(2).

Byrne, A. (2009). The importance of culture in digital ecosystems: Managing Indigenous research data. Proceedings of the International Conference on Management of Emergent Digital EcoSystems, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1145/1643823.1643825

Callison, C. (2019). Honouring Indigenous voices and creating relationships in archival and cultural memory praxis. [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=koukh_eyheo 

Callison, C. (2021, April 23). Unsettling Praxis and Building Relationships with Indigenous People. PowerPoint Deck-Camille Callison-Unsettling Praxis

Callison, C., Roy, L., & LeCheminant, G. A. (Eds.). (2016). Indigenous Notions of Ownership and Libraries, Archives and Museums. Berlin/Munich: De Gruyter Saur.

Canadian Federation of Library Associations (CFLA). (2018, August 27). Position Statement: Indigenous Knowledge in Canada’s Copyright Act. Canadian Federation of Library Associations (CFLA).

Carroll, S. R., Akee, R., Chung P., Cormack, D., Kukutai, T., Lovett, R., Suina, M., & Rowe, R. K. (2021). Indigenous Peoples’ data during COVID-19: From external to internal. Frontiers in Sociology, 6(617895). http://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2021.617895

Carroll, S. R., Garba, I., Figueroa-Rodríguez, O. L., Holbrook, J., Lovett, R., Materechera, S., … & Hudson, M. (2020). The CARE Principles for Indigenous data governance. Data Science Journal, 19(1), 43. http://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2020-043

Carroll, S. R., & Martinez, A. (2019). Policy brief: Indigenous data sovereignty in Arizona: Setting an agenda. Tucson: Native Nations Institute, University of Arizona and Inter Tribal Council of Arizona.

Carroll Rainie, S., Rodriguez-Lonebear, D., & Martinez, A. (2017). Policy brief: Data governance for Native nation rebuilding. (Version 2). Tuscon: The University of Arizona Native Nations Institute.

Carroll, S. R., Rodriguez-Lonebear, D., & Martinez, A. (2019). Indigenous data governance: strategies from United States Native Nations. Data Science Journal, 18(1), p. 31. http://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2019-031

Carroll Rainie, S. C., Schultz, J. L., Briggs, E., Riggs, P., Palmanteer-Holder, N. L. (2017). Data as a strategic resource: Self-determination, governance, and the data challenge for Indigenous Nations in the United States. The International Indigenous Policy Journal, 8(2). doi:10.18584/iipj.2017.8.2.1

Christen, K. (2011). Opening archives: Respectful repatriation. The American Archivist, 74, 185-210.

Chung, P., & Chung, M. (2019). Indigenous Data Sovereignty in the Mekong Region. Annual World Bank Conference on Land and Poverty.

Digital Research Alliance of Canada. (n.d.). Welcome to DMP Assistant. Digital Research Alliance of Canada.

Doyle, A. M. (2013). Naming, claiming and (re)creating: Indigenous knowledge organization at the cultural interface [PhD dissertation, University of British Columbia].

Duarte, M. E. (2017). Network sovereignty: Building the internet across Indian country. Seattle: University of Washington Press.

Ermine, W., Sinclair, R., & Jeffery, B. (2004). The ethics of research involving Indigenous Peoples. Saskatoon: Indigenous Peoples’ Health Research Centre.

First Archivists Circle. (2007). Protocols for Native American archival materials.

First Nations Centre. (2005). Ownership, control, access, and possession (OCAP) or self-determination applied to research: A critical analysis of contemporary First Nations research and some options for First Nations communities. Ottawa: National Aboriginal Health Organization.

First Nations Health Authority. (2015, October 29). Introduction to data governance – Gwen Phillips.

First Nations Health Authority. (2016). FNHA data governance engagement sessions.

First Nations Health Authority. (2016). Regional data governance forums.

First Nations Health Authority. (2016). The backdrop for development of First Nations Peoples’ data governance and health indicators.

First Nations Information Governance Centre. (2014). Barriers and levers for the implementation of OCAP™. The International Indigenous Policy Journal, 5(2).

First Nations Information Governance Centre. (2014). Ownership, control, access and possession (OCAP™): The path to First Nations information governance.

First Nations Information Governance Centre. (n.d.). Understanding the First Nations principles of OCAP™. Ottawa: First Nations Information Governance Centre.

Fleerackers, A. (2020, November 17). Managing research data: A beginner’s guide. ScholCommLab. https://www.scholcommlab.ca/2020/11/17/managing-research-data/

Gardiner, G., McDonald, J., Byrne, A., & Thorpe, K. (2010). Respect, trust and engagement: Creating an Australian Indigenous data archive. World Library and Information Congress: 76th IFLA General Conference and Assembly.

Gardiner, G., & Thorpe, K. (2014). Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander data archive: Connecting communities and research data. Language Documentation and Description, 12, 103-119.

Gibson, J. (2009, June). Managing Indigenous digital data: An exploration of the Our Story database in Indigenous Libraries and Knowledge Centres of the Northern Territory. University of Technology Sydney.

Gifford, H., & Kirikowhai, M. (2019). Te Kete Tū Ātea: Towards claiming Rangitīkei iwi data sovereignty. Journal of Indigenous Wellbeing, 4(1).

Google Canada. (2017). Indigenous lands in Canada are now in Google Maps. Google Canada.

Government of Canada. (2019). Setting new directions to support Indigenous research and research rraining in Canada 2019-2022.

​Government of Canada. (2020). Module 9: Research Involving First Nations, Inuit & Métis Peoples of Canada. Panel on Research Ethics.

Gregory, A. (2021, April 12). How did a self-taught linguist come to own an Indigenous language? The New Yorker. 

Hayward, A., Sjoblom, E., Sinclair, S., & Cidro, J. (2021). A new era of Indigenous research:  Community-based Indigenous research ethics rotocols in Canada. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 16(4), 403–417. 

Imrie, R., Fabbri, C., Saganash, K., & Bosum, A. (2022, May 6). Data Sovereignty. PowerPoint Deck-Rob Imrie, Chanelle Fabbri, Kory Saganash, Annie Bosum-Data Sovereignty

Indigenous Navigator. (2021). A global tool for Indigenous Peoples.

Indigitization. (n.d.). Indigitization – Tools for digitizing and sustaining Indigenous knowledge.

Indigitization. (n.d.). Indigitization toolkit. Indigitization toolkit (Tools for digitization projects).

Johnson-Jennings, M. D., Jennings, D. R., & Little, M. M. (2019). Indigenous data sovereignty in action: The Food Wisdom Repository. Journal of Indigenous Wellbeing, 4(1).

Jorgensen, M. (2012). Sustaining Indigenous culture: The structure, activities and needs of Tribal Archives, Libraries and Museums.

King, A., & King, M. (2021). Research with Indigenous People: Ethical Considerations and Community Engagement.

Kukutai, T. (2019). Reflections on Indigenous sovereignty. Journal of Indigenous Wellbeing, 4(1).

Kukutai, T. (2021). Indigenous Data Sovereignty.

Gerritsen, M., & Orozco Bohorquez, C. (2021, December 9). Tahu Kukutai | Advocating for indigenous data sovereignty. [Audio podcast episode]. In Women in Data Science. Stanford University. https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/tahu-kukutai-advocating-for-indigenous-data-sovereignty/id1440076586?i=1000544475839

Lovett, R., Lee, V., Kukutai, T., Cormack, D., Carroll Rainie, S., & Walker, J. (2019). Good data practices for Indigenous data sovereignty and governance. In A. Daly, S. K. Devitt, & M. Mann (Eds.), Good data: Theory on demand (pp. 26–54). Lulu.com.

Kukutai, T., & Taylor, J. (Eds.). (2016). Indigenous Data Sovereignty: Toward an agenda. Canberra: Australian National University Press.

Kukutai, T., & Walter, M. (2015). Recognition and indigenizing official statistics: Reflections from Aotearoa New Zealand and Australia. Statistical Journal of the IAOS, 31(2), 317–326.

Kurtz. M. (2006). A postcolonial archive? On the paradox of practice in a northwest Alaska project. Archivaria, 61, 63-90.

Lar-Son, K. (2021, February 2). Data as relation: Indigenous data sovereignty and ethic of care.

​Lawson, K. (2004). Precious fragments: First Nations materials in archives, libraries and museums [MA thesis, University of British Columbia].

Local Contexts. (n.d.). Grounding Indigenous Rights.

Lovett, R., Lee, V., Kukutai, T., Cormack, D., Carroll, S. R., & Walker, J. (2019). Good data practices for Indigenous Data Sovereignty. In A. Daly, S. K. Devitt, & M. Mann (Eds.), Good data: Theory on demand (pp. 26-36). Institute of Network Cultures.

Maiam nayri Wingara Collective, Te Mana Raraunga Māori Data Sovereignty Network, & United States Indigenous Data Sovereignty Network. (2019). Oñati Indigenous Data Sovereignty (ID-SOV) Communique.

Mathiesen, K. (2012). A defense of Native Americans’ rights over their traditional cultural expressions. The American Archivist, 75, 465-481.

McBride, K. (2017). Data Resources and Challenges for First Nations Communities: Document Review and Position Paper. The Alberta First Nations Information Governance Centre.

McGregor, D., Restoule, J. P., & Johnston, R. (2018). Indigenous research: Theories, practices and relationships. Canadian Scholars’ Press.

McMahon, R., LaHache, T., & Whiteduck, T. (2015). Digital data management as Indigenous resurgence in Kahnawà:ke. The International Indigenous Policy Journal, 6(3).

Montenegro, M. (2019). Subverting the universality of metadata standards: The TK labels as a tool to promote Indigenous data sovereignty. Journal of Documentation, 75(4), 731-749.

Moore, C., Castleden, H. E., Tirone, S., & Martin, D. (2017). Implementing the Tri-Council Policy on ethical research involving Indigenous Peoples in Canada: So, how’s that going in Mi’kma’ki? The International Indigenous Policy Journal, 8(2).

Morse, B. W. (2012). Indigenous Human Rights and Knowledge in Archives, Museums and Libraries: Some International Perspectives with Specific Reference to New Zealand and Canada. Archival Science, 12(2), 113-140.

Mukurtu. (n.d.). Home: Mukurtu CMS.

Mustimuhw Information Solutions Inc. (2015). Data Governance Framework.

Nakata, M., Nakata, V., Gardiner, G., McKeough, J., Byrne, A., & Gibson, J. (2008). Indigenous digital collections: An early look at the organisation and culture interface. Australian Academic and Research Libraries, 39(4), 223-236.

National Indigenous Knowledge and Language Alliance/Alliance nationale des connaissances et langues autochtones. (June 21, 2019). First Nations, Metis and Inuit – Indigenous Ontologies (FNMIIO). National Indigenous Knowledge and Language Alliance/Alliance nationale des connaissances et langues autochtones NIKLA/ANCLA.

O’Neal, J. R. (2015). “The right to know”: Decolonizing Native American archives. Journal of Western Archives, 6(1).

Phillips, G. (n.d.). Comprehensive Resource and Information Management System for Indigenous Nations: CRIMSIN: An Accountability Tool for Self-Governing Nations.

Portage Network. (n.d.). DMP Templates. DMP Assistant. Retrieved 2022, from https://assistant.portagenetwork.ca/public_templates.

Research Data Alliance International Indigenous Data Sovereignty Interest Group. (2019). CARE Principles for Indigenous data governance.

Riddell, J. K., Salamanca, A., Pepler, D. J., Cardinal, S., & McIvor, O. (2017). Laying the groundwork: A practical guide for ethical research with Indigenous communities. The International Indigenous Policy Journal, 8(2).

Robinson, L., Haig-Brown, C., St.Onge, A., Bergen, H., & Newton, J. (2022, May 6). Listening to the land. PowerPoint Deck-Loretta Robinson, Celia Haig-Brown, Anna St.Onge, Heather Bergen, Janet Newton-Listening to the Land

Rowe, R. (2021, April 23). Reflections on Indigenous data sovereignty, the Global Indigenous Data Alliance, and the CARE Principles for Indigenous data governance. PowerPoint Deck-Robyn Rowe-Reflections on Indigenous Data Sovereignty

Rowe, R. K., Bull, J. R., & Walker, J. D. (2020). Indigenous self-determination and data governance in the Canadian policy context. In M. Walter, T. Kukutai, S. R. Carroll, D. Rodriguez-Lonebear, (Eds.). Indigenous data sovereignty and policy. London: Routledge. 

Sasakamoose, J., Bellegarde, T., Sutherland, W., Pete, S., & McKay-McNabb, K. (2017). Miýo-pimātisiwin Developing Indigenous Cultural Responsiveness Theory (ICRT): Improving Indigenous Health and Well-Being. The International Indigenous Policy Journal, 8(4).

Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. (2018). Toward a successful shared future for Canada: Research insights from the knowledge systems, experiences and aspirations of First Nations, Inuit and Métis peoples. Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada.

South African San Institute. (2017). San Code of Research Ethics. South African San Institute. 

Steering Committee on Canada’s Archives. (2020). A reconciliation framework for Canadian Archives: Response to the report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission Taskforce of the Steering Committee on Canada’s Archives. Steering Committee on Canada’s Archives.

Steffler, J. (2016). The Indigenous data landscape in Canada: An overview. Aboriginal Policy Studies, 5(2).

Taylor, J., & Kukutai, T. (2015). Report to the Academy of the Social Sciences in Australia on the Workshop Data Sovereignty for Indigenous Peoples: Current practice and future needs.

Te Mana Raraunga Māori Data Sovereignty Network. (2018). Principles of Māori Data Sovereignty. Te Mana Raraunga Māori Data Sovereignty Network.

The Sustainable Heritage Network. (n.d.). Browse Digital Heritage. https://sustainableheritagenetwork.org/digital-heritage

The Sustainable Heritage Network. (n.d.). The Sustainable Heritage Network. https://sustainableheritagenetwork.org/

Thorpe, K. (2013). Protocols for libraries and archives in Australia: Incorporating Indigenous perspectives in the information field. IFLA WLIC 2013.

Toronto Metropolitan University. (2023, March 24). Research data management. https://learn.library.torontomu.ca/rdm

Digital Research Alliance of Canada. (n.d.). Research Data Management. https://alliancecan.ca/en/services/research-data-management

Digital Research Alliance of Canada. (n.d.). Training Resources. https://alliancecan.ca/en/services/research-data-management/learning-and-training/training-resources

Trevethan, S. (2019). Strengthening the availability of First Nations Data. QMR Consulting.

Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. (2015). Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada: Calls to Action. Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada.

Tsosie, R. (2019). Tribal data governance and informational privacy: Constructing “Indigenous Data Sovereignty.” Montana Law Review, 80(2).

United Nations. (2008). United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. United Nations.

United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. (2018). A human rights-based approach to data: Leaving No One Behind in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.

United States Indigenous Data Sovereignty Network. (n.d.). Promoting Indigenous Data Sovereignty through Decolonizing Data and Indigenous Data Governance. United States Indigenous Data Sovereignty Network.

University of Melbourne. (2017). Indigenous Data Sovereignty Symposium Presentations and Roundtables. University of Melbourne.

Walter, M., & Carroll, S. R. (2020). Indigenous data sovereignty, governance and the link to Indigenous policy. In M. Walter, T. Kukutai, S. R. Carroll, & D. Rodriguez-Lonebear (Eds.), Indigenous data sovereignty and policy (pp. 1–20). London: Routledge. 

Walter, T., Kukutai, T., Carroll, S. R., & Rodriguez-Lonebear, D. (2020). Indigenous data sovereignty and policy. London: Routledge.​

Walter, M., & Suina, M. (2019). Indigenous data, Indigenous methodologies and Indigenous data sovereignty. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 22(3), 233-243.

Whaanga, H., Bainbridge, D., Anderson, M., Roa, T., Keegan, T., Scrivener, K., & Cader, P. (2015). He Matapihi Mā Mua, Mō Muri: The Ethics, Processes, and Procedures Associated with the Digitization of Indigenous Knowledge—The Pei Jones Collection. Cataloging and Classification Quarterly, 53(5-6), 520-547.

Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., … Mons, B. (2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3.

Woodbury, R. B., Beans, J. A., Hiratsuka, V. Y., & Burke, W. (2019, October 10). Data management in health-related research involving indigenous communities in the United States and Canada: A scoping review. Frontiers in Genetics, 10(2019). https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2019.00942

York University. (n.d.). Creating a research data management plan. Open Access and Open Data Steering Committee.